Sotavasara.net

Kylis kirjoitti:Toivottavasti GW ei kuse uutta edikkaa samalla tavalla, kuin fabassa.

Haizelhoff kirjoitti:Kyl kompiton faba on aika kaukana taktisesta, ja kompitettukin noppariippuvaista, mut se on vaan mun mielipide. Toivoisin ite vaan et 6. edikan yhteydessä armeijakirjat tasoittuis.

aatami kirjoitti:

Kylis kirjoitti:Toivottavasti GW ei kuse uutta edikkaa samalla tavalla, kuin fabassa.

What the *£#&? 8'th:han mullisti faban todella hyvään suuntaan. Näillä näkymin 40K:lle on suunnitteilla samanlainen mullistus oikeaan suuntaan.
Toivon vain, että 40K:sta tulisi oikeasti taktinen peli, siirtyen pois blingbling-kimble tilasta, jossa se on nyt jo pitkän aikaa virunut. Toisena toivona sitten parempi tasapaino.

MakeH kirjoitti:

aatami kirjoitti:

Kylis kirjoitti:Toivottavasti GW ei kuse uutta edikkaa samalla tavalla, kuin fabassa.

What the *£#&? 8'th:han mullisti faban todella hyvään suuntaan. Näillä näkymin 40K:lle on suunnitteilla samanlainen mullistus oikeaan suuntaan.
Toivon vain, että 40K:sta tulisi oikeasti taktinen peli, siirtyen pois blingbling-kimble tilasta, jossa se on nyt jo pitkän aikaa virunut. Toisena toivona sitten parempi tasapaino.

Turnauspelaajan näkökannalta FaBa raiskattiin...

Furinji kirjoitti:Lähde

especially Necrons, are coming into quite the threat. Well, mankind just doesn't have the power, and now Necrons are threatening Chaos, and the Chaos forces are like 'well wtf guyz'. This will be expanded on in the coming Codices, including Necron and Chaos Legions, which should set up for the big fluff change in 6th edition.

He/She wouldn't go into specifics, but said that a lot of what had been said online was true, some of it wasn't entirely correct, and some of it was correct but just worded extremely poorly to a point where it made the rule seem more complex than it actually was or made the rule seem somehow different. He/She said he/she had played games using the new rulebook and said that the games didn't take much longer to complete than they already are, if anything they were making a point that some of the more convoluted rules have been streamlined and some of the rules that were "too basic" got changed as well. He/She said that, if anything, the game feels much more strategic with the new rulebook, though he/she did say that some of the rules take "a bit of getting used to."

EDIT: Codex books won't be invalidated by the new rules apparently, but the new rulebook will come with an FAQ section for each already existing army to clarify any confusion or mix-ups in concern to the new rules.

Also, to those worried about the lack of Imperial releases, my source did say that new models and finecast were coming out over the next year for a few Imperial loyalist armies, including Imperial Guard, and that after Eldar we'd be, and I quote, "sick of Imperial releases."

As for why they chose certain armies over armies that needed it more (Dark Angels, Black Templars, etc), it was apparently due to lore/fluff reasons. Chaos is going to be a major threat come 6th Edition to everyone, not just the Imperium, and apparently they (Chaos) will have a front against the Tau Empire, hence why Tau are getting a release before-hand. The perspective/narrative is also changing apparently and it won't be only or heavily Imperial, he/she said that GW wanted to make some of the other "good" races (Tau Empire, Eldar) feel just as important as the Imperium when it comes to lore/fluff and the fate of the galaxy. This was apparently some of the reasoning behind why Tau Empire and Eldar are getting books before armies like Dark Angels and Black Templars.

As for the actual Tau Empire rules, all my source was willing to say was that a good deal of the rumours currently on the internet about Tau are true, but that some were false or just poorly worded, and that he/she couldn't give out or confirm/deny specifics as he/she "might get in trouble." Apparently, some GW staff are allowed to leak certain details to the public via the internet, but are very specific as to what is allowed to be said by who.

...

Just asked my source about the two Chaos books ghost21 mentioned. He said that Legions was coming first and that Renegades would first get a WD article soon after that and that a new Codex would come out later (about 1-2 years after the WD article).

For those worried that Tau Empire aren't going to be as mean as a post-6th Edition Codex, fear not. From what my source said, the last several Codex books are going to have "the shortest FAQs in the rulebook" as they were "designed with the 6th Edition rules in mind."

Covenant kirjoitti:

Also, to those worried about the lack of Imperial releases, my source did say that new models and finecast were coming out over the next year for a few Imperial loyalist armies, including Imperial Guard, and that after Eldar we'd be, and I quote, "sick of Imperial releases."

Flogger kirjoitti:Isoin ongelma varmaan tulee olemaan, miten niistä Renegadeista saadaan sitten mitenkään kiinnostavia. Ettei vaan käy niin että on Tactical Chaos Marineja jotka ajavat Chaos Razorbackeilla ja messissä Chaos Assault Terminaattoreita Chaos Land Raider Crusaderissa, saattajana pari Chaos Land Speederiä...

Legioonillehan kyllä löytyy ennestään vaikka ja mitä, ja lisää on helppo keksiä.

jamovoima kirjoitti:Demoniset sotakoneet jne. olis kyllä jees. Vähemmän predatoreja ja vindicatoreita, enemmän silver tower of Tzeentchejä ja blood slaughterer of khorneja.

Ilkeäpelimies kirjoitti:Muuten olisiko tämä huono ajatus: Kirja Legioonille ja Petturikaartille.

Näin saatai siin enemmän kaaos kamaa ja jotkut pääsee vihdoinkin pelaa virallisesti pettureilla ;)