Sotavasara.net

DC kirjoitti: The sentence in Explosivo "Models in the AOE other than the model that was directly hit suffer blast damage but do not suffer any other effects of the attack" causes confusion since "effects" has been interpreted in a number of different ways by different players. Here is the comprehensive list of what that damage roll is and is not affected by:
* The roll IS a magical blast damage roll (based on the spell description)
* The roll IS able to be modified like other damage rolls via boost, additional die, +/- modifier, additional die then drop low, etc. (based on it being a damage roll)
* The roll IS the damage type of the weapon affected by Explosivo (based on consistency with past rulings regarding damage types)
* The roll IS NOT affected by any other abilities or advantages whatsoever (based on the "any other effects" wording above)

For some of you, this is exactly how you've been playing it. For others, we hope this clears up any confusion.

It's a magical blast-y possibly-a-damage-type damage roll that can be modified like any other damage roll but that has no other abilities whatsoever.

demel kirjoitti:ja eikös se AP:kin tule primaariin targettiin kuitenkin, mutta ei blastille ? (vai ymmäriinkö tahallani väärin ?)

demel kirjoitti: Ja, asiaa sivuava kysymys:

Jos Huntterilla ampuu Heavyä/colossaalia, kun Siegen featti on päällä, onhan targetin armor *0.25 ? Ei siinä että tulis kovin usein vastaan, mutta voi tulla...